Saturday Night Live (SNL) is well-known for its ability to mix humor with current cultural references, often pushing the boundaries of what is considered acceptable. One of the show’s entertaining traditions has been the “joke swap” between co-hosts Colin Jost and Michael Che. This playful exchange fosters a refreshing dynamic, where Jost and Che compose and deliver jokes tailored for each other, showcasing their distinctive comedic styles. However, a recent incident has drawn renewed attention to the impacts of comedic choices, raising questions about the boundary between humor and shock.
During the special Christmas episode aired on December 21, a particular joke crafted by Che escalated tensions. Che’s quip about the Avengers star, Scarlett Johansson, caught the audience and Johansson herself off-guard. Jost had been briefed prior by SNL about the joke being edgy, and Johansson had previously consented to the potential of a crude commentary aimed at her. However, the live response revealed a degree of vulnerability and surprise that was perhaps unforeseen. Jost later recounted her reaction, emphasizing that Johansson appeared genuinely taken aback, which sparked a conversation about the unpredictability of live comedy.
Post-show, Jost expressed concern over Johansson’s response during an appearance on The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon. When asked whether he felt he was “in trouble” with Johansson, he admitted, “I’m in trouble, I think, with a lot of people.” This frankness highlights the nuanced reality of comedy—what can be humorous to one person may strike another as offensive or inappropriate. Even after receiving a heads up about the joke, Johansson’s shock signifies how quickly the atmosphere can shift, especially under the bright lights of live television.
Moreover, Jost revealed that he found the moment completely genuine; his inability to feign a reaction underlined the organic nature of their comedic environment. When delivering the joke, he referenced the popular Costco roast beef sandwich in a somewhat audacious metaphor, comparing it to Johansson’s body. Such references are not merely quirky; they challenge the audience’s expectations of humor associated with beloved public figures, further complicating the relationship between celebrity and comedy.
This incident serves to illustrate the intricate dance between comic license and accountability. It questions the fundamentals of comedic expression: How far can humor push before it crosses into discomfort? Jost’s reflection on the situation urges audiences and comedians alike to ponder the effects of humor on relationships, especially when real people are involved—all while retaining the essence of what makes comedy charming. Although jokes have a purpose, comedians must tread carefully, acknowledging that not every punchline lands as intended. Ultimately, this situation between Colin Jost and Scarlett Johansson might very well serve as a learning experience, not just for them, but for the industry as a whole.